Live
Breaking
2h ago Esports Build a Valorant Uninstaller: PowerShell Script in 12 Steps [2026] 4h ago Hardware & Chips Apple A20 Pro Doubles A19 Pro Speed on 27B AI Model [2026] 4h ago Cryptocurrency BIP-39 Passphrase Setup: Hidden Wallet in 12 Steps [2026] 5h ago AI & Machine Learning Anthropic Says Claude Leads 26% of Its Own AI R&D [2026] 5h ago AI & Machine Learning Unity Plugins Give Claude Code 29 Skills, Codex 31 [2026] 6h ago Provably Fair Loot Box Odds Laws 2026: Korea’s 3x Damages, US Zero 6h ago Cybersecurity Gemini AI Hacked 3 Companies in Security Test [2026] 7h ago Esports Fortnite Ranked vs FNCS: 22 Tiers, $10M Prize Pool [2026] 8h ago Cryptography ZK Proofs vs Homomorphic Encryption: 68x Speed Gap [2026] 12h ago Cloud Computing Ambarella-ZEDEDA Deal Targets $30B Edge AI Market [2026] 13h ago Hardware & Chips Apple M6 GPU Score Nears RTX 4080, Beats M5 by 34% [2026] 13h ago Hardware & Chips M5 Ultra Outscores M3 Ultra by 59% in Geekbench Test [2026] 16h ago Cryptocurrency Bitcoin Quantum Risk: 7M BTC Exposed, BIP-360 Still Just a Proposal [2026] 1d ago Cloud Computing Kubernetes vs Docker Swarm: 82% Adoption, 38% Faster Scale [2026] 2h ago Esports Build a Valorant Uninstaller: PowerShell Script in 12 Steps [2026] 4h ago Hardware & Chips Apple A20 Pro Doubles A19 Pro Speed on 27B AI Model [2026] 4h ago Cryptocurrency BIP-39 Passphrase Setup: Hidden Wallet in 12 Steps [2026] 5h ago AI & Machine Learning Anthropic Says Claude Leads 26% of Its Own AI R&D [2026] 5h ago AI & Machine Learning Unity Plugins Give Claude Code 29 Skills, Codex 31 [2026] 6h ago Provably Fair Loot Box Odds Laws 2026: Korea’s 3x Damages, US Zero 6h ago Cybersecurity Gemini AI Hacked 3 Companies in Security Test [2026] 7h ago Esports Fortnite Ranked vs FNCS: 22 Tiers, $10M Prize Pool [2026] 8h ago Cryptography ZK Proofs vs Homomorphic Encryption: 68x Speed Gap [2026] 12h ago Cloud Computing Ambarella-ZEDEDA Deal Targets $30B Edge AI Market [2026] 13h ago Hardware & Chips Apple M6 GPU Score Nears RTX 4080, Beats M5 by 34% [2026] 13h ago Hardware & Chips M5 Ultra Outscores M3 Ultra by 59% in Geekbench Test [2026] 16h ago Cryptocurrency Bitcoin Quantum Risk: 7M BTC Exposed, BIP-360 Still Just a Proposal [2026] 1d ago Cloud Computing Kubernetes vs Docker Swarm: 82% Adoption, 38% Faster Scale [2026]
NewsroomLive
Today13 new
Archive845 stories
Last filed2h ago
Languages10
UTC20:32:07
Top Story Esports

Build a Valorant Uninstaller: PowerShell Script in 12 Steps [2026]

Uninstalling Valorant sounds like a two-click job until Vanguard gets involved. Riot's kernel-level anti-cheat leaves behind a driver, two Windows services, a chunk of ProgramData, and registry keys that survive the normal uninstaller more often than…

2h ago  ·  Sep 20, 2026 Read the brief

The Desks

// editorial departments

Latest

// fresh from the editors

More from the desks

// keep digging
// about

About Shattered.io

This domain has been home to the SHAttered SHA-1 collision project since 2017, and is now a hub for cryptography, security and privacy reporting. The full origin story of the project, the two proof PDFs and the research credits live below.

The SHAttered project — origin, proof files and research credits

On 23 February 2017, researchers at CWI Amsterdam and Google showed the world the first real collision for the SHA-1 hash function. The project was called SHAttered, and this domain has been its home ever since. The two files that prove the break are still here to download.

What a collision actually is

A cryptographic hash takes any file and returns a short fixed-length fingerprint. The promise is simple: change a single bit of the file and the fingerprint changes too, and no two different files should ever share one. A collision breaks that promise. It is a pair of distinct inputs that produce the exact same hash. For a function used to sign software, certificates and documents, a collision is not a curiosity. It is a crack in the foundation.

What SHAttered produced

The team did not just argue that SHA-1 was weak on paper. They built the evidence. Two PDF files, visibly different and carrying different content, share one identical SHA-1 value: 38762cf7f55934b34d179ae6a4c80cadccbb7f0a. Run either file through SHA-1 and the answer matches. Run them through SHA-256 and the answer differs, which is how anyone can confirm they are genuinely two separate files.

What the attack cost

The break was expensive, and that was part of the point. Producing the collision took roughly nine quintillion SHA-1 computations, the work of about 6,500 CPU-years and 110 GPU-years run in parallel. That scale kept the attack out of reach for a casual attacker in 2017, yet it ran thousands of times faster than trying every possibility by brute force. The direction of travel was clear: the cost would only fall.

Why SHA-1 had to retire

Once a working collision exists, trust in a hash erodes quickly. Within months the result pushed browsers, certificate authorities and version-control systems to drop SHA-1 for anything security-sensitive. Git added collision detection. TLS certificates signed with SHA-1 were phased out. The lesson reached far past one algorithm: a function can look safe for years and still fall the moment the maths and the hardware line up.

The research and the people behind it

SHAttered was the work of Marc Stevens and Pierre Karpman at CWI Amsterdam, together with Elie Bursztein, Ange Albertini and Yarik Markov at Google. It built on years of earlier cryptanalysis of the SHA-1 design. The full technical paper that documents the method is preserved here.

Beyond the collision

The same questions that drove SHAttered run through everything we cover here: how hashing works, where it is used, and how systems prove they have not cheated. These guides pick up where the research leaves off.

What you'll find on shattered.io today